public:cb_mirror:sample_testimony_from_montana_3_pdf_files_29857
To view this on the COS website, click here sample-testimony-from-montana-3
To download the pdf file from the COS website, click here COS_Testimony_2023-3_Dismantling_the_1787_runaway_convention_myth.pdf
Sample Testimony from Montana #3
Written Testimony graciously provided by the COS Montana Team
Attachment: 4707/COS_Testimony_2023-3_Dismantling_the_1787_runaway_convention_myth.pdf
![]() Dismantling the 1787 Philadelphia Runaway Convention Myth Mr/Mrs Chairman, thank you for this opportunity to testify. 1787 was a milestone year for the United States. On May 13 fifty-five commissioners from 12 states met in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention. However, this Convention was not the only significant event of that year. 3 months prior, on February 21, the Congress of the Confederation, released the following opinion. Let me summarize. Congress recommends to the 13 States that the Philadelphia convention be limited to the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation, and report to the Congress . So, if you only consider Congress’s opinion that February it might appear to the uninformed that the Philadelphia Convention exceeded its call or ran-away. There is more to this story. The previous year, in September, a Convention of States was held in Annapolis. The Annapolis convention was formally titled “Meeting of Commissioners to Remedy Defects of the Federal Government”. The Annapolis convention was a general convention where all 13 states were formally invited. However only 5 states attended, and without the ability to reach a quorum, the Annapolis convention adjourned, and issued a formal call to meet in Philadelphia the following May of 87. The Annapolis call was for a broad convention in Philadelphia, and it happened five months before Congress’s opinion in Feb of 87, and 8 months before the Philadelphia Convention convened. On the heels of the Annapolis call, in November 86, the Virginia legislature formally approved the convention in language even broader than that issued in Annapolis. Realizing that there were only 5 states who attended the Annapolis convention, Virginia lawmakers then reissued the call directly to all states. New Jersey issued a similar call in the same time period. As of the end of 86 a total of 7 states had RSVP’d for the Philadelphia Convention and the 5 most recent states wrote their commission orders to allow the same scope of power that Virginia had authored and New Jersey concurred. New Jersey even appointed its commissioners to the Philadelphia Convention. None of the 7 states limited their delegates to just amending the Articles of Confederation. This was all complete 2 months before Congress’s opinion of Feb 87, and 6 months before the Constitutional Convention convened in Philadelphia. Finally, by the end of February 87, three more states RSVP’d to the Virgina call. This brought the total number to 10 states who RSVP’d with commission statements in line with the Virginia call. 2 states, New York and Massachuttes also RSVP’d but were limited to amending the Articles of Confederation. Rhode Island did not respond or attend. In conclusion, the historical record, and the calendar of events show the Philadelphia ![]() convention was long in the works before Congress’s February opinion. This train had long left the station. The Philadelphia Convention was not a runaway. The call of the Convention was broad enough to either amend or replace the Articles of Confederation. 10 states concurred 2 didn’t. And even those 2 states later revised their commission to match the other 10. Thank you |
| Page Metadata | |
| Login Required to view? | No |
| Created: | 2025-05-30 20:59 GMT |
| Updated: | 2025-05-30 21:00 GMT |
| Published: | 2025-05-30 21:00 GMT |
| Converted: | 2025-11-11 12:35 GMT |
| Change Author: | Sarah Santana |
| Credit Author: | |
public/cb_mirror/sample_testimony_from_montana_3_pdf_files_29857.txt · Last modified: 2025/11/11 12:35 by 127.0.0.1

