public:cb_mirror:responses_to_objections_txt_pages_17975
To view this on the COS website, click here responses-to-objections
Responses to Objections
You've heard the objections? Our experts give you the real answers in 3 minutes or less.
| We've heard all the opposition arguments–many times. And they all have answers. Here they are from some of our experts, in short video clips. Opposition Argument 1: We've only had one constitutional convention, and it was a runaway. The Article V Convention isn't a safe process. Response by Michael Farris, Esq. https://youtu.be/BY6QnIGD4go Opposition Argument 2: There’s no way to control a modern-day Article V Convention. They might throw out parts of the Bill of Rights or draft a whole new Constitution. Response by Mark Meckler, Esq. https://youtu.be/bN1Lmjva3KY Opposition Argument 3: A Convention is a bad idea, because Congress will just take over it. Congress will choose the delegates, set the agenda, and make the rules. Response by The Honorable Rick Santorum, former U.S. Senator https://youtu.be/Sfw2CYyxKaM Opposition Argument 4: The whole problem is that the federal government doesn’t obey the Constitution, so why should we think that changing it will fix anything? Response by Rita M. Peters, Esq. https://youtu.be/GIgd9BjpoD0 Opposition Argument 5: We have no idea how a Convention would work, because Article V doesn’t tell us. Response by Rick Green, America's Constitution Coach https://youtu.be/n82exC6zLqA |
| Page Metadata | |
| Login Required to view? | No |
| Created: | 2022-12-01 14:16 GMT |
| Updated: | 2025-02-18 21:34 GMT |
| Published: | 2022-12-07 08:00 GMT |
| Converted: | 2025-11-11 12:40 GMT |
| Change Author: | Rita Peters |
| Credit Author: | |
public/cb_mirror/responses_to_objections_txt_pages_17975.txt · Last modified: 2025/11/11 12:40 by 127.0.0.1