public:cb_mirror:2a_open_letter_pdf_files_29275

To view this on the COS website, click here 2a-open-letter

To download the pdf file from the COS website, click here 2A_OpenLetter_COSA042025.pdf


2A Open Letter

Attachment: 4690/2A_OpenLetter_COSA042025.pdf

 





O

ur constitutional rights, 

especially our Second 

Amendment right to keep 

and bear arms, are in peril. With every 

tragic violent crime, liberals renew 

their demands for Congress and 

state legislatures to enact so-called 

“commonsense gun control” measures 

designed to chip away at our individual 

constitutional right to armed self-

defense.

Indeed, were it not for the 

determination and sheer political 

muscle of the National Rifle 

Association, Senator Feinstein’s 

2013 bill to outlaw so-called “assault 

weapons” and other firearms might 

well have passed.

But the most potent threat facing 

the Second Amendment comes 

not from Congress, but from the 

Supreme Court. Four justices of the 

Supreme Court do not believe that 

the Second Amendment guarantees 

an individual right to keep and bear 

arms. They believe that Congress and 

state legislatures are free not only to 

restrict firearms ownership by law-

abiding Americans, but to ban firearms 

altogether. If the Liberals get one 

more vote on the Supreme Court, the 

Second Amendment will be no more.

Constitutional law has been the 

dominant focus of my practice for 

most of my career as a lawyer, first in 

the Justice Department as President 

Reagan’s chief constitutional lawyer 

and the chairman of the President’s 

Working Group on Federalism, and 

since then as a constitutional litigator 

in private practice. For almost three 

decades, I have represented dozens 

of states and many other clients in 

constitutional cases, including many 

Second Amendment cases. In 2001, 

for example, I argued the first federal 

appellate case to hold that the Second 

Amendment guarantees every law-

abiding responsible adult citizen an 

individual right to keep and bear 

arms. And in 2013 I testified before 

the Senate in opposition to Senator 

Feinstein’s anti-gun bill, arguing 

that it would violate the Second 

Amendment.

So I am not accustomed to being 

accused of supporting a scheme that 

would “put our Second Amendment 

rights on the chopping block.” This 

charge is being hurled by a small gun 

rights group against me and many 

other constitutional conservatives 

because we have urged the states 

to use their sovereign power under 

Article V of the Constitution to 

call for a convention for proposing 

constitutional amendments designed 

to rein in the federal government’s 

power. 

The real threat to our constitutional  

rights today is posed not by an Article 

V convention of the states, but by an 

out-of-control federal government, 

The 2nd Amendment and Convention of States

Convention of States Action- Updated April 2025

THE SECOND AMENDMENT

and Convention of States

An Open Letter Concerning

By Charles J. Cooper 

— 

LONG TIME CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LITIGATOR FOR THE NRA





exercising powers that it does not 

have and abusing powers that it does. 

The federal government’s unrelenting 

encroachment upon the sovereign 

rights of the states and the individual 

rights of citizens, and the Supreme 

Court’s failure to prevent it, have 

led me to join the Legal Board of 

Reference for the Convention of 

States Project. 

[Convention of States] mission is to 

urge 34 state legislatures to call for 

an Article V convention limited to 

proposing constitutional amendments 

that “impose fiscal restraints on the 

federal government, limit its power 

and jurisdiction, and impose term 

limits on its officials and members of 

Congress.” 

I am joined in this effort by many 

well-known constitutional 

c o n s e r v a t i v e s , 

including Mark 

Levin, Professor 

Randy Barnett, 

Professor Robert 

George, Michael Farris, 

Mark Meckler, Professor 

Robert Natelson, Andrew 

McCarthy, Professor John Eastman, 

Ambassador Boyden Gray, and 

Professor Nelson Lund. All of us have 

carefully studied the original meaning 

of Article V, and not one of us would 

support an Article V convention if we 

believed it would pose a significant 

threat to our Second Amendment 

rights or any of our constitutional 

freedoms. To the contrary, our 

mission is to reclaim our democratic 

and individual freedoms from an 

overreaching federal government.

The Framers of our Constitution 

carefully limited the federal 

government’s powers by specifically 

enumerating those powers in 

Article I, and the states promptly 

ensured that the Constitution would 

expressly protect the “right of the 

people to keep and bear arms” by 

adopting the Second Amendment.

  But the Framers 

u n d e r s t o o d 

human nature, 

and they 

could foresee 

a day when 

the 

federal    

g o v e r n m e n t 

would yield to the 

“encroaching spirit of 

power,” as James Madison 

put in the Federalist Papers, 

and would invade the sovereign 

domain of the states and infringe the 

rights of the citizens. The Framers 

also knew that the states would be 

powerless to remedy the federal 

government’s encroachments if the 

process of amending the Constitution 

could be initiated only by Congress; 

as Alexander Hamilton noted in 

the Federalist Papers, “the national 

government will always be disinclined 

to yield up any portion of the authority” 

it claims. So the Framers wisely 

equipped the states with the means of 

reclaiming their sovereign powers and 

protecting the rights of their citizens, 

even in the face of congressional 

opposition. Article V vests the states 

with unilateral power to convene for 

the purpose of proposing constitutional 

amendments and to control the 

amending process from beginning 

to end on all substantive matters.

The day foreseen by the Framers – the 

day when the federal government far 

exceeded the limits of its enumerated 

powers – arrived many years ago. The 

Framers took care in Article V to equip 

the people, acting through their state 

legislatures, with the power to put a 

stop to it. It is high time they used it.

“The real threat to our constitutional rights today is posed not by 

an Article V convention of the states, but by an out-of-control 

federal government, exercising powers that it does not have and 

abusing powers that it does.”

Support the only solution that is as big as the problem.

www.conventionofstates.com         [email protected]

Sign the petition at conventionofstates.com

Page Metadata
Login Required to view? No
Created: 2025-04-21 18:44 GMT
Updated: 2025-04-21 18:44 GMT
Published: 2025-04-21 18:44 GMT
Converted: 2025-11-11 12:35 GMT
Change Author: Eric Greenwood
Credit Author:
public/cb_mirror/2a_open_letter_pdf_files_29275.txt · Last modified: 2025/11/11 12:35 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki